This
past Friday students at high schools around the country
engaged in a Day of Silence. This has become an annual
event.
The Day of Silence began in 1997 as a way to highlight
the harassment that gay and lesbian students have endured
over the years at the hands of their classmates. The
concept is pretty simple. Students spend the day
completely silent. They refuse to speak. Many students
will adorn their mouths with makeup or tape to indicate
that they are participating.
While I understand that gay and lesbian students have
been harassed over the years, the Day of Silence is
completely inappropriate in our schools. Furthermore, the
administration and staff should be admonished for
condoning it.
In the pure abstract, the Day of Silence is a
relatively benign event. The problem is that it is not an
abstract event. It is very real and it has very real
consequences.
The most obvious problem with the Day of Silence is
that it wastes an entire day of classroom instruction. The
students do not speak. They can’t participate in
classroom discussions or ask questions about their
assignments.
Teachers have limited choices. They can accommodate the
students who are protesting and accept the wasted day.
This has to be a hard pill to swallow for teachers who
care about providing a quality education.
The teachers’ other choice is to treat the protesting
students as they would any other student who refuses to
complete required schoolwork and fail them. To do so,
however, would undoubtedly subject the teacher to baseless
charges of discrimination and harassment. This is why
most, if not all, teachers choose the easy route and
either tolerate or encourage the students to be silent.
The fact that the students who participate in the Day
of Silence waste classroom time is no small matter,
because they are not just wasting their own time. They are
also wasting the time of the other students who are there
to learn.
Furthermore, what about those students whose faith or
moral foundation teaches them that homosexuality is wrong?
High school students are highly impressionable and are
susceptible to peer pressure. It is unjust to put those
students in a position of being forced to either accept a
lifestyle that they consider to be immoral or face
ridicule, ostracism, or worse. While it is a noble effort
to combat the harassment that homosexual kids have faced
over the years, it is repulsive to do so by putting other
kids in a position to be harassed.
Finally, the fact that the administration and the
faculty either implicitly or explicitly support the Day of
Silence is unacceptable. Our schools are incredibly
valuable to our society, but they do have a finite
responsibility. They exist to educate our children to
prepare them to be responsible members of our Republic and
useful in our economy so that they can be gainfully
employed. They do not exist to advocate or protest
particular lifestyles, sexual orientations, or moral
codes.
As a society, we accept this principle on some issues.
For example, we would not accept our public schools
holding a day to support the message of Jesus Christ and
educate the children on His teachings. Nor would we
tolerate our public schools spending a day teaching our
children the virtues of euthanasia. These are not issues
about which we either empower or entrust our public school
teachers to instruct our children.
Our public schools should have no role in either
supporting or opposing homosexuality. There is a time and
a place for almost everything and the classrooms of our
public schools should be reserved for education.
(Owen B. Robinson, a West Bend
resident, is a blogger who publishes at www.bootsandsabers.com. His column usually runs Tuesdays
in the Daily News.)