For
the fourth time, Gov. Jim Doyle has included a provision in his
2009-11 executive budget proposal that would allow undocumented
immigrants in Wisconsin to receive in-state tuition at state
universities and technical colleges. The three previous provisions
were removed by the state Legislature during budget negotiations.
This time, the provision should stay.
Currently, very few undocumented citizens in Wisconsin attend
state colleges, because of the existing requirement forcing them to
pay significantly higher out-of-state tuition. Many of the 450 to
600 undocumented immigrants who graduate from Wisconsin high schools
every year would be accepted to various state universities, and the
additional tuition revenue would be a welcome addition to the
University of Wisconsin system.
The provision would apply to students who have lived in Wisconsin
for at least three years, graduated from Wisconsin high schools, and
otherwise meet the same admission criteria applied to other state
residents. Undocumented immigrants must also provide proof that they
will apply for citizenship upon their earliest eligibility to do so.
While this final qualification requirement becomes the sticking
point for many who oppose Doyle’s provision, it’s irrelevant to
the issue. The UW system should strive to recruit students who
graduated from Wisconsin high schools, meet their admission
requirements, and who want to better their lives through education.
Applying for citizenship or not doesn’t adversely impact any of
the above benefits to the UW system or to Wisconsin as a whole.
Wisconsin is hardly leading the way on this issue. If the
Legislature preserves Doyle’s provision, Wisconsin would be the
11th state in the country to allow in-state tuition for undocumented
immigrants.
Doyle’s objectors like to conveniently inflame sentiment
against immigrants in Wisconsin, by acting as though such a proposal
would effectively give state taxpayer money to the children of
undocumented immigrants. But according to the Wisconsin Legislative
Fiscal Bureau, the plan could increase tuition revenue. This makes
logical sense, because 100 undocumented immigrants attending state
schools and paying in-state tuition amounts to far more revenue than
five to 10 undocumented immigrants attending state schools and
paying out-of-state tuition. Even using conservative estimates of a
20 percent college attendance rate among undocumented immigrants who
graduate from Wisconsin high schools, the benefit to the UW system
would be measured in millions of dollars.
Without such a provision, many of these children of undocumented
immigrants face a glass ceiling of sorts, without any real
possibility of college despite sufficiently meeting the
qualifications to advance their education. As a society, we can’t
continue to complain about undocumented immigrants and a perceived
relative lack of contribution to our economy from those individuals,
if we also refuse to give them the tools to build future careers.
Effectively locking undocumented immigrants out of our state-run
universities is not a formula for repairing the problems related to
immigration in Wisconsin.
American entertainer Will Rogers once said, "America is a
land of opportunity and don’t ever forget it." It appears
that some Wisconsin residents have not only forgotten this fact, but
have even twisted the saying to apply only to those who are
currently American citizens, thereby defeating the original purpose
of the expression. Enabling the children of undocumented immigrants
to attend college in Wisconsin stands consistently with the
principles upon which America was founded.
Doyle’s provision would not grant free tuition to the children
of undocumented immigrants. According to the Legislative Fiscal
Bureau, it would not cost state taxpayers any money. It would not
give undocumented immigrants admission preference over legal
residents of the state of Wisconsin, nor would it admit students who
would not otherwise qualify for admission. To the contrary, this
provision would merely treat these students in the same manner as
any of their classmates from their high school graduating class,
neither favoring nor disfavoring those students, academically or
financially.
Because it levels the playing field for the children of
undocumented immigrants, the state Legislature should preserve Doyle’s
provision regarding in-state tuition for these students.
Tim Schilke is the author of "Growing up Red" and lives in
Grafton. His column runs Wednesdays in The Freeman.