gmtoday_small.gif

 


These cars just didn't measure up, list of decade's worst 

October 6, 2009 


Forget ObamaCare and the federal deficit. Let's even put aside the mess in the Middle East for a minute. We've got real controversy here. The editors at Cars.com have compiled a list of the worst cars of the decade.

For the record, I agree with most of them. I had to paraphrase the editor's comments, but the rankings — in descending order — are:

1. Smart ForTwo (2008-present): The ForTwo may look cute, but you won't be smiling after you drive it.

2. Chrysler Sebring (1995-present): With a weak base power train, poor interior quality and haphazard styling, it never had a chance in the midsize sedan segment.

3. Jeep Compass (2007-present): A soft-road poseur, and not a good one at that.

4. Toyota Echo (2000-2005): Call the Echo ahead of its time if you must. Mainly, it just wasn't a very good car.

5. Cadillac Catera (1997-2001): A soft, underpowered rear-wheel-drive car that felt front-wheel-drive and suffered from advertising that proclaimed "The Caddy That Zigs."

6. Pontiac Sunfire (1995-2005): Cheap interior plastics run amok, a coarse four-cylinder engine and horrendous crash-test ratings sealed its fate.

7. Jaguar X-Type (2002-2008): A too-small, not-so-sporty sedan hamstrung by quality issues.

8. Isuzu VehiCross (1999-2002): The fanglike grille on the outrageous two-door SUV looked like it would eat you, which was scary mainly because no one wanted to be inside a VehiCross.

9. Daewoo anything (2001-2005): We mused over which would kill us first in a Daewoo: toxic gases from the cheap interior, the recalcitrant transmission or inconsistent acceleration.

10. Pontiac Aztek (2001-2005): It was criticized for its ghastly styling for the duration of its life. The critics were right.

 


McClatchy-Tribune Information Services