Station wagons
aren't very popular in America these days — although
the crossover SUVs everyone is buying are little more
than taller wagons with all-wheel drive. Anyway,
Cadillac, which offers a crossover SUV, thought it
needed a true wagon to compete against entries from
Audi, BMW, Mercedes and Volvo. And so, for 2010 we have
the CTS Sport Wagon.
Although
Consumer Reports' "worse than average"
reliability assessment for the CTS is worrisome, I think
you will like Cadillac's first wagon for North America
— as much as sedan buyers will like the CTS sedan from
which it is derived. Except for a bit more unpleasant
engine noise and harshness than is appropriate in a
luxury car, this was a tester I hated to give back.
The CTS wagon
is pricey, though: $39,090 with freight for the least
expensive version, with the less-powerful of two
available engines and rear drive. That's about $3,000
more than the sedan.
All-wheel drive
adds about two grand, if you'll settle for the
3.0-liter, 270-hp. engine. A rear-drive version with the
more powerful, 3.6-liter, 304-hp. engine I sampled lists
for $44,190, and the top-of-the-line CTS wagon, with the
304-hp. engine and all-wheel drive, lists for $46,090.
On sale since
August, this wagon is as much fun to drive as the CTS
sedan and as comfortable to ride in. Its lower-than-an-SUV
center of gravity means carlike handling. An optional
FE3 package, not in the tester, includes a firmer
suspension, quicker steering and wider and Z-rated
summer performance tires on larger, 19-inch wheels and
bigger disc brakes.
Both engines
run on regular unleaded and are government estimated at
about the same, 18 miles per gallon in local driving, 26
or 27 on highways. I averaged less than 17 mpg, however,
in four days of mostly local driving.
GM says the CTS
wagon will tow a 1,000-pound trailer.
Standard safety
features include rear-seat thorax-protecting air bags
plus the head-protecting bags almost every car now has.
The federal government gives the CTS sedan and wagon
four out of a five stars for frontal protection and five
out of five for side-impact protection. The Insurance
Institute for Highway Safety calls the CTS
"good" in front-, side- and rear-impact
protection.
Cadillac has
been a very high scorer for years in the surveys by J.D.
Power and Associates of vehicle quality and dealer
ability to keep customers happy. And that goes for the
CTS, too; Power predicts its reliability as "better
than most." Since both Consumer Reports and Power
ratings are based on owner surveys, it's difficult to
explain why the wide variation in this case. Anyway, the
magazine's testers liked the CTS overall.