"Detective
Story," by Imre Kertesz; Knopf ($21)
___
Why is
it that the work Americans are exposed to after an
obscure European novelist wins the Nobel Prize so
often bemuses rather than satisfies?
Such is
the case with Imre Kertesz's "Detective
Story," set in an unnamed South American country
during an oppressive military dictatorship. That
generic title is instructive. Kertesz casts his
narrative in the frame of a hard-boiled police
procedural, that durable genre so useful to writers
from Ed McBain to Georges Simenon to the great Swedish
team of Maj Sjowall and Per Wahloo. But like
Hemingway's "The Killers," or Camus'
"The Stranger," his aim is higher than
suspense or entertainment.
"Detective
Story" is told in retrospect as the confession of
a secret policeman awaiting execution for various
tortures and political murders during the recently
deposed military regime. Antonio Martens, an ambitious
young police officer, had not been with "the
Corps" long, and the crimes he saw and committed
in its name have left him sickened with remorse.
"I
am an honest flatfoot, I always was," Martens
declares near the beginning, "and I take my work
seriously. Of course, I was aware that a different
yardstick applied here at the Corps, but I thought at
least there was a yardstick. Well, there wasn't, and
that was when my headaches started."
Working
with the sadistic Rodriguez and their superior, Diaz -
"the ever-unruffled and ever-soothing Diaz"
- Martens sets about the business of keeping track of
suspected revolutionaries, bringing them in for
"interrogation" once their guilt seems
assured. When Martens protests Rodriguez's zeal,
saying he thought "we were serving the law
here," Diaz corrects him: "Those in power,
sonny boy."
"Detective
Story" soon devolves upon a single case when
Enrique Salinas, an angsty rich boy, comes to the
Corps' attention. From the moment surveillance begins,
he is doomed.
"In
short, our records had already identified that Enrique
was going to perpetuate something sooner or later. As
far as we were concerned, his fate was sealed, even if
he himself had not yet made up his mind. He was
hesitating, playing for time. He roamed the streets or
wrote in his diary, raced around in his Alfa Romeo,
visited friends, or popped into bed with some
silky-smooth kitten, if he happened to feel so
inclined. Enrique Salinas was young, just twenty-two;
his long hair, his wisp of a mustache and beard alone
marked him as suspicious in our eyes."
Misunderstandings
on all sides soon implicate Enrique's father Federigo,
a wealthy and well-connected department store magnate,
perhaps as a mastermind. The story's considerable
suspense rises from the ways in which the guiltless
Salinas family, through a series of youthful
recklessness and excessive fatherly caution, contrive
to make their arrests inevitable. The poignancy of the
twist - what exactly father and son were up to - is
the strongest emotion evoked in the book.
The
Hungarian-born Kertesz, who won the Nobel Prize for
literature in 2002, is best known for novels ("Fatelessness,"
"Kaddish for an Unborn Child,"
"Liquidation") that follow the impact of the
Holocaust on a survivor at different stages of life.
Imprisoned at Auschwitz at age 14, he resolutely
denies his novels are autobiographical.
"Detective
Story" marks Kertesz's first foray outside Jewish
subject matter or a European setting. Yet his
characteristic themes are everywhere present, as when
Rodriguez, early in the narrative, delivers an
anti-Semitic tirade that seems outside the scope of
the narrative, as Jews do not figure in the story,
and, of course, anti-Semitism is not a prerequisite
for authoritarian repression. This somewhat jarring
note serves the purpose, however, of explicitly
linking the atrocities suffered by South Americans
with those of European Jews, suggesting that political
torture and murder, wherever it arises, serves the
same impulse, even when it is not a matter of
genocide.
"Detective
Story" is the kind of short novel that repays
rereading. Its effects, wrought with subtlety and
craftsmanship, tend to suppress the humanity of its
characters the first time through, leaving us little
moved by their tragedy. A casual reader might protest
that too little care is expended on the police
procedural framework for the existential seriousness
Kertesz asks it to support.
Reading
the novel a second time, however, reveals the
necessary elements were present all along. What seemed
indistinct and colorless before suddenly sharpens into
vivid clarity. Enrique, Federigo and Martens - and,
indeed, Rodriguez and Diaz - become more than types,
and what happens, or doesn't happen, to them matters.