Dieters beware: Food
and restaurant labels might be sabotaging your
calorie-counting efforts.
So found a study published in the current
edition of the Journal of the American Dietetic Assn, http://www.eatright.org/Media/content.aspx?id=4294967696.
Researchers from Tufts University took commercially prepared
foods both prepackaged and from restaurants and
analyzed them in a bomb calorimeter. The measured energy
values of 10 frozen meals purchased from supermarkets averaged
8 percent more than originally stated, and foods from 29
restaurants (both fast-food and sit-down venues) were on
average 18 percent more than reported.
That hidden and unwelcome extra can
fool dieters who don't have the time to cook their own meals
into thinking they're cutting their caloric intake.
It certainly undermined the efforts of Susan
B. Roberts, lead author on the study. The Energy Metabolism
Laboratory director said she originally conceived of the idea
for the experiment after designing two diets one that
required home-cooked meals, and another that did not. Roberts
tested the diets out on herself, and her frustration quickly
began to mount. In her home cooked-meal diet, she had lost
weight consistently and on target. The no-cook regimen,
however, was another matter.
"I wasn't losing any weight,"
Roberts explained in an interview. "This was ridiculous.
I came into the lab one day and thought, something's not
adding up I think there's more calories in these foods
than there should be."
Roberts put hr theory to the test. The
results? A Lean Cuisine shrimp and angel hair pasta label says
it's 220 calories (which works out to 250 calories of gross
energy, the study calculates). The Tufts team pegged gross
energy at 319. Denny's dry toast lists 92 calories (97 kcal of
gross energy). Instead, it let off a whopping 283 calories.
The discrepancies were a little less extreme
than those in the Pirate's Booty scandal back in 2002, when a
suspicious Good Housekeeping (http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/product-testing/ghri-test-kitchen/snack-scandals?click=mainsr
) employee tested the apparently low-fat snack (label: 2.5
grams of fat) and found it had 8.5 grams, more than three
times the stated amount. And to be fair, some foods came in
under caloric value (a serving of Domino's thin crust cheese
pizza had 141 calories, 33 percent less than expected). But
why did most foods seem to err in excess? Roberts said it was
likely because "package manufacturers are just playing it
safe."
"The FDA regulations are much more
punitive, much more stringent on underproviding than
overproviding," the scientist said. "It's an old
style mentality: 'People need to be given what they pay
for.'"
Roberts' advice to dieters? Don't starve
yourself just know what you put into your body. "If
you want to lose 10 pounds, you can do it with food. Food is
the best way. But by eating at home, you'll have a much easier
time."
In any case, if you're eating at a place
where "dry toast" earns you 283 calories, you're
probably not on the low-calorie bandwagon to begin with.