|
Based on last year's gun deer hunt,
Department of Natural Resources officials figure to get an
earful at the annual spring fish and wildlife hearings.
The hearings in Waukesha County
will begin at 7 p.m. April 13 at Waukesha County Technical
College, in the Anderson Education Center, 800 Main St.,
Pewaukee.
It's the best chance we as
hunters and anglers have all year to let the DNR know what we
think.
There are 91 questions on the
survey, and below are a few that affect us here in Southeastern
Wisconsin and many that are hot statewide.
QUESTION 27: Urban pond proposals
The department proposes to add
Regner (Washington County) and Foxbrook (Waukesha County) ponds
to the state's urban fishing program, in which there would be a
continuous open season, but only persons under 16 years of age
or disabled may fish. It means they'd get stocked with trout,
too.
My take: Sure, why not? But it's
a shame that a senior citizen can't wet a line also.
QUESTION 52: Reduce the size of
Vernon Marsh waterfowl refuge because certain areas are no
longer needed as goose refuge.
Vernon Wildlife Area is a
4,655-acre property with 740 acres of refuge. This proposal
would eliminate 395 acres of refuge on the north side of the
property and open that area to all normal hunting activities.
My take: The area was used
primarily as a goose refuge, and with there now being too many
geese in these parts, why not open it up? Heck, anyone who's
hunted the Vernon Marsh knows it would be nice to have a little
more room to roam.
QUESTION 29: Extend the fall
turkey season into December
The fall turkey season currently
begins on the Saturday nearest Sept. 15 and continues through
the Thursday prior to the beginning of the nine-day November
deer gun season. Biologists have indicated that they do not
anticipate negative impacts to the turkey population with a
further extension of the season. However, outside of prime
turkey habitat, at the northern extent of the turkey's range,
cold and deep snow may provide hunters with an advantage.
Therefore, providing a season extension in southern Wisconsin,
during a two-year trial, may provide the state with enough data
to determine if a season extension is a workable and
biologically sound option.
My take: Give it a shot. If the
population can handle it, why not have a longer season to work
with?
QUESTION 64: Eliminate
Earn-A-Buck and October antlerless deer hunts
Wisconsin's deer hunting heritage
and tradition is protected by a constitutional right to hunt.
Some hunters feel the current EAB and October special antlerless
hunts are unreasonable in that they negatively impact hunting
traditions and deny hunters the right to hunt bucks.
My take: This one will fly among
our state's hunters, but why would the DNR listen now? We've
been asking for an alternative for years and so far our requests
have fallen upon deaf ears. Sure, there have been a few attempts
at modest changes to these rules, but nothing has really stuck.
QUESTION 70: Tree stands on state
lands
This one would allow hunters to
leave stands up on state land much like it is on most county and
national forest lands. You'd need to have it marked with your
name and phone number, and it would have to be removed at the
end of the season.
My take: Having hunted public
ground for a while now, I can tell you it would be nice not to
have to take my stand down each day in the dark. Still, I have
mixed emotions, as I don't need some "good ol' boy"
marking "his" spot and claiming it for an entire
season.
QUESTION 78: Prohibit legislation
regarding wildlife and fisheries management without public
hearings or DNR input
In the previous state budget, a
legislator inserted a provision pertaining to wildlife
management without input or support from the DNR, the
Conservation Congress, the Natural Resources Board or the
general public through the annual spring hearings. Fish and game
decisions should be made by, and in cooperation with, trained
professional resource managers and the public. Rule changes
should go through the DNR rule-making process and the
Conservation Congress spring hearings to gauge public sentiment.
My take: Ya think? Do you really
want our legislators slipping in ideas that could affect our
hunting and fishing opportunities? Heck no! This one will pass
by a landslide.
(Dan Durbin writes a weekly
outdoors column for The Freeman. Call Durbin at 644-7940, or
e-mail him at ddurbin@bastdurbin.com
if you have a story idea.)
|