WASHINGTON
- With federal and state college loan programs reeling
from the credit crunch caused by the subprime mortgage
crisis, state officials are worried about what will
happen this summer when a surge of students begins
applying for fall semester money.
An
increasing number of banks, private lenders and state
agencies are dropping their student loan programs,
forcing students to scramble for new sources of money.
While some experts say students should be able to
easily find new lenders, students who switch could end
up with higher interest rates and fewer benefits, such
as paid upfront loan fees, as the financial market
tightens.
And
some experts worry that escalating loan costs could
discourage some students from applying at all.
In a
time of what loan officials say is unprecedented
uncertainty, students asking about whether certain
loans are available are getting answers like, "As
of today, yes."
Among
the skittish lenders are state loan programs run by
state agencies or nonprofit lending groups. These
agencies have traditionally offered loans with better
benefits than their for-profit counterparts, but some
have stopped offering federal loans, cutting off a
main source of tuition money to hundreds of thousands
of students. This year, for example, about 14,700
students in Massachusetts and 500,000 in Pennsylvania
received these loans, but both states have suspended
their programs.
This
month, Kentucky announced that unless more money
becomes available, it will not accept loan
applications from new students after May 1, closing
the door on 27,500 potential borrowers.
Other
states have suspended their private loans, which will
leave 20,000 students in Iowa, for example, looking
elsewhere for money.
There
are two types of student loans: federal loans, which
are funded by lenders but guaranteed by the federal
government, and private loans. To raise money for both
types of loans, lenders, including state agencies,
float bonds, but wary investors are staying away from
all markets, including those for traditionally safe
student loans.
There
has not been one successful bond auction for new
student loans since last year. As a result, eight
states have either suspended their private loan
programs or pulled out of the federal loan program -
three of them just last week.
Since
mid-February, agencies in Massachusetts, Minnesota,
Pennsylvania and Texas have announced they will stop
offering federal loans. In addition to Iowa, lending
groups for Missouri and New Hampshire have suspended
their private loan programs. Michigan has dropped both
types of loans.
Private
loans offered by some states help students cover what
the capped federal loans don't, and they offer better
benefits for less costly fees. The suspensions of some
state private loans mean that the 8,500 Michigan
students who this year received the MI-LOAN and the
6,160 students in New Hampshire who borrowed almost
$8,000 each from the state's loan program will be out
of luck if they re-apply.
"That's
6,000 students in New Hampshire who are in the middle
of finals, getting letters from schools, who are going
to have to make adjustments," said Tara Payne,
spokeswoman for the New Hampshire Higher Education
Loan Corp., which announced last month it was
suspending its alternative loan program.
"What
we hope is that the cost to borrow for students isn't
so high that they decide it isn't worth it,"
Payne said.
More
students depend on the state agencies to give them
federal loans. Nationwide, 11.3 percent of students
receive federal loans through state agencies; the rest
of the loan money is largely dispersed by banks,
directly by the federal government and by other
private lenders.
The
federally guaranteed loans come through the Federal
Family Education Loan Program. But since the fall,
more than 50 lenders - both for-profit lenders such as
banks and nonprofit lenders like state agencies - have
dropped out of FFELP or scaled back participation. The
departing lenders represent 13.6 percent of the
current loan pool.
The
U.S. House this month overwhelmingly passed a bill
clarifying that the U.S. education secretary has the
authority to advance money to lenders of last resort
in the event every lender drops out of the federal
program, and buy up loans that lenders have been
unable to sell to investors to give them money to make
new loans. The Bush administration sent a letter to
key congressional members on April 23 supporting the
provisions and encouraging the Senate to expedite
approval of its own bill.
But
critics say the federal government needs to pump even
more money into the system. If not, "I would
expect to see many more lenders leaving the student
loan program by the end of the 2008-09 year,"
said Mark Kantrowitz, the founder of FinAid.org, a
financial-aid Web site.
Adding
to the uncertainly, colleges - and students - can be
caught off guard by these sometimes sudden departures.
Just two weeks before TCF Bank, one of the 50 largest
student loan providers, announced March 20 that it was
dropping out of FFELP, the bank sent a letter touting
its student loan benefits to Michigan State
University's financial aid office.
"If
we had been doing business with them, recommending
them, we would have to go and undo everything we had
done and help students and parents start all over
again," said Rick Shipman, the school's financial
aid director. "My concern is how much time and
energy it will take to identify lenders that are
participating in the program, and bring that
information to students when they need to have
it."
Lenders,
both private and state, have also suffered from a
federal law enacted last year which cut subsidies and
increased their financial risks and fees, and resulted
in a cut in profits.
In
recent weeks, large lenders like Sallie Mae and
Citigroup announced they were cutting benefits and
suspending federal loan consolidations, or the
combination of two or more loans into a single loan;
Citigroup also said it would make loans at colleges
only if it deemed such loans profitable. Bank of
America Student Lending has suspended all private
loans.
Another
two states could soon join the five that have already
left the federal program. The Arkansas Student Loan
Authority announced last week that it might not have
enough money to offer loans for the next school year.
Lack of money also led the Kentucky Higher Education
Student Loan Corp. to announce it will not accept
applications for federal loans from new students after
May 1. The agency, which usually receives about 27,500
new applications a year, distributes 70 percent of
federal loans in the state, spokeswoman Jo Carole
Ellis said.
Asked
if she thought the students would be able to find new
lenders, Ellis said: "That's the big question -
we don't know. We do not know to what extent other
lenders will step up to the plate. ... If the other 30
percent (of lenders) double their volume, that still
does not cover the whole market."
Other
state agencies say students should be able to easily
find new lenders for loans. So far, experts say, no
student has been unable to get a federal loan, and
though more than 50 lenders have dropped out, FFELP
has more than 2,000 more.
Some
experts say the problem is being blown out of
proportion; they say these 2,000 lenders remaining in
FFELP will pick up the business abandoned by other
lenders and that, at worst, students have another
layer of hassle by having to find new lenders.
"People
should not be worried about their ability to get a
loan to pay for college," said Robert Shireman,
executive director of the Project on Student Debt, an
advocacy group pushing for affordable loans.
"They should be aware that the lender they used
last year might not be making loans this coming year,
so they may need to choose a new lender ... but they
are not going to see the rug pulled out from under
them."
(Disclosure:
One funder of the Project on Student Debt is The Pew
Charitable Trusts, which also funds Stateline.org, the
producer of this report.)