 |
|
In
this March 6 file photo, tears roll down the face of Green
Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre as he cries during a
news conference announcing that he was officially retiring
from football, at Lambeau Field in
Green Bay
.
|
Remove emotion from
the unfortunate Brett Favre episode, and it pares down to this:
Did the Green Bay
Packers-Mark Murphy, Ted Thompson, Mike McCarthy and everyone who
opted to move forward with Aaron Rodgers as the No. 1 quarterback-make
the right decision?
That we can't know
until some point this season.
Did they make the
best decision?
Yes, they did.
Actually, Thompson,
who bears responsibility as general manager, didn't have to make
that call.
Favre made it for
him four months ago.
When a professional
athlete says he can no longer give everything he's got to a
brutally demanding sport that requires complete mental and
physical dedication, that's it. Favre said he could still play,
and no doubt he can, but declared before the world that he was
mentally worn down by everything except the three-hour commitment
on game day. As Favre correctly said, it would not be fair to
anyone, including him, to be a three-hour-a-week football player.
The Packers asked
Favre if he were absolutely sure. Of his own free will, he flew to
Green Bay for the announcement. No one forced him to say he could
no longer put himself through the drudgery of training camp and
practice and the mind-numbing meetings. It's the worst part of the
job, but essential for teammates to be entirely certain that their
leader is unconditionally committed to the group effort.
Now, does a man
have the right to change his mind?
Of course he does,
but only in situations he can control.
No matter how much
power Favre wielded in Green Bay, he was still a player, still an
employee, subject to the team's decisions and the greater good of
the franchise. A Hall of Fame player, yes, but a roster spot just
like the other 52 Packers, no more, no less. The problem occurred
when Favre became bigger than one of the most famous sports
franchises in the world. That should never happen. It can only
cause problems.
Like the colossal
mess going on now.
Franchises stay.
Players, no matter how beloved, go. Joe Namath taking a beating in
a Los Angeles Rams uniform is a sad reminder.
People got caught
up in a cult of personality with Favre. They adored him for his
down-home and common-man sensibilities, and his charm. That's
genuinely him.
Did he use that to
his advantage in a place like Green Bay? Sure. Favre occasionally
got a pass from the fans and portions of the media, me included,
when he would've been booed or ripped elsewhere for boneheaded
mistakes.
But when a player
continues to play that card in a situation where it is patently
unfair to everyone involved, it's called something else. It's
selfish.
That would not have
been an adjective applied to Favre as a player. But what are we to
think now if he just wants to play so badly that nothing else
matters? Ask yourself: Just to scratch that itch, would he really
go back to a place like Atlanta with no chance to win?
Favre owes the
Packers nothing. No better or worse than any franchise, Green Bay
will use and abuse a player like them all.
Meanwhile, the
Packers owe Favre nothing, other than his gigantic salary should
he be reactivated.
The Packers don't
have to trade Favre, but they should. Let him play, but it can't
be here. That union is irrevocably broken.
Favre opted to take
a knee. It was the best call by the player and the team.