When Entertainment Weekly sat down
last year to compile the best 25 novels of the last 25 years,
there was surprisingly little dissent when the magazine listed
Cormac McCarthy’s "The Road" in the top slot.
A dreary, dire documentation of a post-apocalyptic future,
"The Road" is the story of a father and son wandering
the barren landscape, searching their souls for some sliver of
hope that when they reach the coast, and see the ocean, they
will discover some solace from the agony that is day-to-day
life.
All along the way, as they follow the weaving highway, they
run into mobs of thugs, who have apparently turned to
cannibalism and mean them ill.
It’s a shocking portrait of a scary future. After some
mysterious massive explosion, the skies have gone gray, the
people have disappeared, the farming has dried up and the cars
have come to a halt.
Humanity is at the brink, and yet in the middle of it all is
this parent, trying to find a way to push on. As he tells his
boy, they are "carrying the fire" of love in a
loveless time.
I picked up the book when I was on vacation in 2008, flipping
through the first pages of an experience that would be far more
traumatic than I had anticipated. What’s stunning about the
book is how little happens, how 50 pages drift by with little
dialogue and little more action than man and boy, counting the
miles down the pavement.
This starkness is precisely what makes the work so bold and
sweeping.
This isn’t a book that simply describes the apocalypse; it
makes you feel the emptiness and monotony that would await all
those who survived the bang, the fire and the fallout.
Knowing that Oprah Winfrey endorsed the book in her book
club, that it was bestowed with the Pulitzer Prize for
literature and that Hollywood was making a big-screen
adaptation, the first question that hit me back in June 2008
was: How are they going to make a movie out of this?
Two characters. Little to no words. Little to no drama. How
does one make a film about endless desperation, and the small
flickering of hope in two men’s hearts?
This is the question that precedes "The Road,"
which is set to hit theaters after a yearlong delay Wednesday.
Dimension Films decided late last year to bump "The
Road" back to 2009, clearly believing that they had a
serious Oscar contender on their hands. And the buzz has been
building. Critics have hailed what they call a faithful
adaptation of McCarthy’s source material, singling out Viggo
Mortensen for playing the story’s father with a degree of
dispassionate conviction that captures the paternal
determination that set the book apart.
But now the $64,000 question for any serious fan of the book
remains: How could they adapt a story that is so sparse and
agonizing? And for those who haven’t read the book, the
question is even more serious: How many families will be drawn
to a cannibalistic tale of doomsday this holiday season?
Even if the book did win the Pulitzer and Oprah’s heart,
will the movie stand a chance of making a dent in the Oscar
competition or at the box office?
Beyond this is a much larger question. Some books cannot, and
indeed should not, be converted to celluloid. Some experiences
are better for the imagination.
Is "The Road" one such cautionary tale, waiting to
be dismissed by the masses, or has director John Hillcoat done
the impossible and taken a hopeless but inspired novel and
captured that precarious balance with visuals and actors?
It’s this holiday season’s biggest gamble at the movie
theater. We’ll weigh in with our analysis on Wednesday.
E-mail: SnyderReviews@hotmail.com